Contempt petition disposed of as the impugned order copy had been filed. Petitors left liberty to approach appropriate forum if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT No. 503 of 2023
Kanhaiya Lal Sahu & others -Versus- Anil Verma & another
| 14 /06/202 4 |
Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate for respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that on 13.06.2024 an order has been passed. Copy of the same is annexed along with the covering memo, which has been filed on 14.06.2024 in the present petition. In view of the order passed on 13.06.2024, nothing remains for adjudication in the present contempt petition. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to redress their grievance in appropriate proceeding, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge |
ved
Kanhaiya Lal Sahu & others
Anil Verma & another
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
