The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a contempt petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel appeared without instructions.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 (CONT No. 339 of 2013)
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 339 of 2013
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. Shailendra Shukla, Counsel For Respondent :- Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Counsel
SBHon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
09. 02.2024
2
(CONT No. 339 of 2013)
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
@d!t!
Santosh Kumar Upadhyay And Ors.
Dr.Babu Lal Agrawal And Anr.
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
