The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner's grievance was redressed and he did not insist on pressing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 7687 of 2011
B.L. Arya, S/o Late L.R. Arya, Aged about 53 years, R/o. C-28, Goul Chowk, Rohnipuram, Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. Govt. Adv. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Dr. Veena Nair, Advocate. For Intervenor : Mr. Sidhhant Rai, Advocate.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
21-06-2023
Sd/(N.K. Chandravanshi) Judge
Amit/-
2
3
B.L. Arya
State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Transmission Company Limited
N.K. Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
