High Court allowed petitioners to file a representation for absorption within 30 days. It directed authorities to decide such representation by a reasoned order within three months. No direction for absorption was issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 603 of 202 3
---- Petitioners
2
Versus
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Virendra Vaishnav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate. For State : Mr. Kapil Maini, PL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board
06.12.2023.
3
production of said representation. It is made clear that this Court has neither expressed any opinion on the merits of the case nor issued any direction for absorption of the petitioners from a particular date.
CC as per rules.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) JUDGE
J/-
Ashok Kumar Kosma and others
State of Chhattisgarh and others
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
