Petitioner sought regularization of services. Court held that High Court cannot direct respondents to regularize employees absent a policy decision. Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 2782 of 2013
Dinesh Kumar Shrivastava S/o Late Mangal Prasad, Aged About 42 Years, Posted as Data Entry Operator, in the office of Deputy Director, Indravati Tiger Reserve Bijapur, PS Bijapur, Distt Bijapur, Revenue Distt Dantewada, Civil Distt Bijapur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For the Petitioner Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate
For the Respondents Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
20.04.2023.
2
maintainable as this Court cannot issue any order to the respondents to regularize unless they take a policy decision, therefore, the instant petition is disposed of. However, if the State deem fit proper take a policy decision to regularize the employee, the case of the petitioner may also be considered.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Santosh
Dinesh Kumar Shrivastava
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Forest Department, Mahanadi Bahwan, New Raipur
The Conservbator of Forest Circle Jagdalpur, Dist Bastar
The Director Cum Conservator of Forest Wild Life Indravati Tiger Reserve Jagdalpur
The Deputy Director Indravati Tiger Reserve Bijapur
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
