Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2626 of 2015
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
08/08/2023 None appears for the petitioner . Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner , this Court is left with no other option, but to dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) JUDGE
Ved
K. Prasanna Kumar
Union Of India
Commandant, 219, Battalion
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
