The High Court disposed of three writ petitions (WPS No. 2066 of 2021, WPS No. 1861 of 2022, WPS No. 1929 of 2022) by applying the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL and others v. C.P. Mundinamani and others.
Disposal of writ petitions in terms of previous orders and Supreme Court precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2066 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
---- Respondents
WPS No. 1929 of 2022
2
4. The Joint Director, Treasury Accounts, And Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) … Respondent(s)
For Petitioners : Mr. Rama Kant Pandey, Advocate. For State : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Dy.A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
17.07.2023
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Jyoti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petitions should be disposed of in conformity with the Supreme Court decision in Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL and others v. C.P. Mundinamani and others.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL and others v. C.P. Mundinamani and othersApplied¶33
Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL and others v. C.P. Mundinamani and others, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 401 · Who else cites this
Pitambar Singh Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh & othersRelied on¶33
WPS No. 3036 of 2020 (Pitambar Singh Nayak v. State of Chhattisgarh & others)
Babulal Patel
Sameer Ulla Qureshi
Ramphal Bareth
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture Department
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
