Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Chaman Lal Satnami Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2023
Chaman Lal Satnami Vs State of ChhattisgarhChaman Lal Satnami v. State of Chhattisgarh

Disposed

Chaman Lal Satnami v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC1 Mar 2023WPCR/595/2022

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 595 of 2022…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPCR No. 595 of 2022

Chaman Lal Satnami S/o Mannu Lal Satnami, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Ganoud, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur (C.G.)

---- Petitioner

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Home Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

Director General of Police (Prisons) Jail Head Quarter, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G)

Inspector General (Prisons), Jail Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G)

Jail Superintendent, Central Jail Raipur, District Raipur (C.G)

Secretary, Legal Aid Service Authority, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G)

---- Respondents

For Petitioner :- Ms. Savita Tiwari, Advocate. For State-Respondents :- Mr. Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer.

Division Bench

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Order On Board (01.03.2023)

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's application for remission is pending consideration before the State Government which has not been considered and decided yet.

Be that as it may, the State Government is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's application for remission within a period of 30 days from the days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not already decided. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

With the aforesaid direction / observation the instant writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Ankit

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Chaman Lal Satnami
respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
respondent
Director General of Police (Prisons)
respondent
Inspector General (Prisons)
respondent
Jail Superintendent, Central Jail Raipur
respondent
Secretary, Legal Aid Service Authority

Coram

AI extract

Sanjay K. Agrawal
Sachin Singh Rajput

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 1 Mar 2023 · March
Registered: 19 Jul 2022
Case no.: WPCR/595/2022
CNR: CGHC010222582022
Topic: Pension and Retirement Benefits
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal Sachin Singh Rajput
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sanjay K. Agrawal Sachin Singh Rajput

Shri Rajendrapuri Vs State of Chhattisgarh
28 Feb 2023
Sushil Vs State Of Chhattisgarh
28 Feb 2023
Suresh Ram Vishvakarma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh
28 Feb 2023
Devendra Kumar Thakur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh
1 Mar 2023
Harlal Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh
1 Mar 2023
Gosnar Tigga Vs State of Chhattisgarh
1 Mar 2023

Cite this judgement

Chaman Lal Satnami v. State of Chhattisgarh, WPCR/595/2022 (CG), decided on 1 March 2023.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sanjay K. Agrawal and Sachin Singh Rajput

Parties & counsel