Permission to withdraw the petition being granted, the writ petition is dismissed as the same has become infructuous. No substantive legal proposition arose.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(C) No. 4415 of 2019
Versus
| 3. The Assistant Engineer, Distribution Company Lim |
Shastri Chauk Zone, Chhattisgarh State Power ited, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Rajat Agrawal, Advocate |
| For Respondents | : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate |
| For Intervener | : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate |
| Hon’ble Shri | Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board |
01.12.2023
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
G. Niazuddin
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited
Superintending Engineer (Raipur Circle)
The Assistant Engineer
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
