Dismissed

Bhagwat Prasad Gadewal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Dec 2023WPC/283/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their Public Interest Litigation petition before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. The Court granted permission, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, vacated an interim order, and noted that the intervener could approach the law.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.

Bhagwat Prasad Gadewal Vs State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 283 of 2019

¶5

1. Bhagwat Prasad Gadewal S/o Chitram Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur ,district Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

2. Pusram S/o Sukul Aged About 69 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶7

3. Satya Prakash S/o Rikhi Ram Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

4. Jeevrakhan S/o Chinta Ram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

5. Pushpa Shrivastava W/o P.D. Shrivastava Aged About 27 Years R/o 27 Kholi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

6. Jileram S/o Late Chintaram Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

7. Dukalu S/o Late Chintaram Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

8. Narendra Singh Sahgal S/o Nanak Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Narmada Nagar Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

9. Shankar Lal Patel S/o Jugaru Patel Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Lokhandi, tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶14

10. Santosh Kumar S/o Jairam Das Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶15

11. Narad Kumar S/o Latel Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶16

12. Punaram S/o Tiharuram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶17

13. Jilau Patel S/o Late Chintaram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶18

14. Mannulal S/o Mkhanlal Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶19

15. Manharanlal S/o Makhanlal Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Lokhandi ,tahsil Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶20

---- Petitioners

¶21

Versus

¶22

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar ,raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶23

2. Secretary Water Resource Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantrlaya Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

3. Commissioner Bilaspur Division ,bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶25

4. Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶26

5. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶27

6. Fill Coal Benefication Privatelimited A Company Registrered Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act 1956,through Its Director Fill Coal

¶28

¶29

Beneficiation Private Limited Third Floor , Mahima Trade Center Hansa Vihar Shrikant Verma Marg Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶30

---- Respondents

¶31

(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)

¶32

For Appellant : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate.
For Respondent No.1 to 5/ State : Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, G.A.
For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate.
For Intervener : Mr. Vaibhav Singh, Advocate.

¶33

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment on Board

¶34

07.12.2023

¶35

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners wish to prefer Public Interest Litigation to agitate their claim, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.

¶36

2. No objection from the other side.

¶37

3. Permission is granted.

¶38

4. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶39

5. Interim order granted earlier is hereby vacated.

¶40

6. Intervener will have right to take recourse to law.

¶41

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶42

Nimmi

Bhagwat Prasad Gadewal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwat Prasad Gadewal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Lachhani Bai and Anr. Vs Ceo,Cg. Electricity Board and Anr.

Leelamber Prasad Kashyap Vs S. Jayvardhan

(Deleted) Rajendra Prasad Dubey,(Died) Through Lrs Vs Alok Kumar

Nand Kishore Choubey (Died) Vs Mani Ram

Sanjay Kumar Suryavanshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tularam And Ors. Vs Devcharan And Anr.