The High Court set aside a Family Court order that awarded interim maintenance during a pending suit for dissolution of marriage without considering an existing Domestic Violence Act maintenance order, remitting the matter afresh.
Order remitted to Family Court for fresh decision; proceedings to conclude expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 47 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
03.07.2023
-2-
respondent is not coming forward to record her evidence and the case is being adjourned. He would orally pray that a direction may be issued to the learned Family Court to conclude the proceedings at the earliest.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Aadil
1 issue framed by the court
Whether maintenance awarded under the Domestic Violence Act should be considered in a Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act application.
Tejas Patel
Smt. Roshni Patel
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
