High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for cross-examination by the Family Court, directing the trial court to allow the cross-examination subject to payment of costs.
Impugned order of 08.12.2022 set aside; trial court directed to allow last opportunity for cross-examination upon payment of Rs. 5,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 45 of 2023
---- Petitioner Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner
: Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate.
Hon’ble Justice Smt. Rajani Dubey
Order on Board
19.01.2023
affect the interest of the petitioner/plaintiff and would also result in miscarriage of justice. He submits that if the petitioner is allowed one last opportunity of cross-examination, the petitioner is ready to pay suitable cost to the plaintiff.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge
Deepti Jha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can quash the Family Court's order rejecting the petitioner's application for cross-examination.
Whether the petitioner should be granted a last opportunity for cross-examination of the defendant.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Chandrakar
Smt. Dipti Chandrakar
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
