Petitioner sought writ under Article 226 against rejection of Section 65(b)(c) Evidence Act application. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and dismissed petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file under Section 482 Cr.P.C.; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP (227) No. 394 of 2020
Dr. Neelam Chand Kothari, S/o Shri Ashkaran Kothari Aged About 56 Years, R/o Priyanka Hospital, Infront Of Government Hospital, G. E. Road, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner
Versus
Niyogi Rasiklal Shah, S/o Shri Rasiklal N. Shah Aged About 64 Years R/o M Sons Agency Private Limited, 4/d. B. Edana Building, 4th Floor, Mumbai Maharastra, District : Mumbai, Maharashtra
--- Respondent
For Petitioner: Mr. Surfaraj Khan & Ms. Deepali Dubey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
28/11/2023
Page 2 of 2
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Dr. Neelam Chand Kothari
Niyogi Rasiklal Shah
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
