COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 249…
Prayer allowed to revive appeal as and when instructions are received; however, appeal dismissed on merits in absence of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 249 of 2022
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant
Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate.
[ Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal { ORDER ON BOARD
(05/07/2023)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Sd/Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge
Kamde
Bharat Bhushan
Coal India Limited
South Eastern Coalfields Limited
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
