This review petition was dismissed as the High Court found no good ground to review an earlier order that had already quashed an eviction notice based on regularization proceedings pending before the Tahsildar, by the time the petition was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 20 of 2021
VERSUS
(cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
03/10/2023
2
order was obtained.
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
pāwān
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient grounds exist to review the earlier order disposing of the writ petition on the facts of encroachment removal.
Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Palika Parishad, Baloda Bazar
Srichand Panjwani
State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
