Radhehari Pandey v. Sukhram
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge of Chhattisgarh HC dismissed the review petition under Rule 90(2) of HC Rules 2007, finding no error on record warranting review of the earlier First Appeal order.
Single Judge of Chhattisgarh HC dismissed the review petition under Rule 90(2) of HC Rules 2007, finding no error on record warranting review of the earlier First Appeal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No.144 of 2022
Radhehari Pandey, S/o Ramanand Pandey, aged about 55 years, Caste - Brahmin, R/o Village - Raveli, Tahsil - Berla, P.S. Berla, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order (In Chamber)
14/06/2023
Sd/-
( Arvind Singh Chandel ) Judge
Shubham
Radhehari Pandey
Sukhram
State of Chhattisgarh
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court