In M.Cr.C.(A) No. 150 of 2023, the court permitted the applicant to withdraw an application for ad-interim bail and directed the trial court to consider a separate regular bail application.
Permission granted to withdraw the bail application with a direction to the trial court to consider a regular bail application on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet
M.Cr.C.(A) No. 150 of 2023
Chandram Nirala S/o Late Prahlad Nirala Aged About 42 Years R/o Pathariya, Thana Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar, Present District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Arakshi Kendra Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar, Present District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondent
| 01/03/2023 | Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Sudhir Sahu, P.L. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application with a direction to the concerned Court below to consider and decide the application for grant of regular bail on the same date. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the applicant prefers an application for grant of regular bail before the concerned trial Court, same shall be considered, preferably, on the same date. In view of the above, I.A. No.1 of 2023, an application for grant of ad-interim bail to the applicant also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge |
|---|
Nimmi
Chandram Nirala
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Arakshi Kendra Bilaigarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
