Application for withdrawal of bail祈祷 was made by counsel without opposition. Bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. Trial court was directed to expedite trial considering applicant has been in jail since 14.03.2022.
Application for withdrawal of bail was dismissed. Trial Court directed to conclude trial as early as possible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC NO. 5053 OF 2023
Hemant Chandra S/o Shri Sukhnandan Chandra Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Bodsara, Tahsil And Police Station Jaijaipur, District : Sakti, Chhattisgarh
… Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
… Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Santosh Kumar Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Shri Jitendra Shukla, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. K. Chandravanshi Order on Board
10.10.2023
1. After arguing for sometime, the counsel appearing for the applicant prays for withdrawal of the bail application, however a direction is sought to be issued to the Trial Court to expedite the trial.
2. The prayer is not opposed by the State counsel.
3. Accordingly, the bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible keeping in view the fact that the applicant is in jail since 14.03.2022.
Sd/(N.K. Chandravanshi) Judge
inder
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the bail application.
Whether to direct the trial court to expedite the trial.
Hemant Chandra
State of Chhattisgarh
N. K. Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
