Allowed

Lalit Kumar Soni (Since Dead) Through L.R. Smt. Meena Soni v. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Union Limited

Chhattisgarh HC3 Nov 2023MCC/181/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, allowed the condonation of delay in filing the Contempt Court's original Side for Copy (MCC). The Court subsequently ordered the restoration of WPS No.7502 of 2007, dismissed earlier for want of prosecution, subject to payment of costs.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay in filing the MCC and restoration of WPS No.7502 of 2007 subject to deposit of cost of Rs. 2,000 within 10 days.

Lalit Kumar Soni (Since Dead) Through L.R. Smt… — Cooperative Societies | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

¶1

Page 1 of 1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 181 of 20 22

¶4

Lalit Kumar Soni (Since Dead) Through L.R. Smt. Meena Soni Wd/o Late Shri Lalit Kumar Soni Aged About 52 Years R/o Block 693, Street 23, Smriti Nagar Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Applicants

¶6

Versus

¶7

1 - Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Union Limited Through Its Managing Director, H.Q. 880, Civil Lines Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶8

2 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Limited, Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

3- Madhya Pradesh State Co-Operative Marketing Union Limited Through Its Secretary, H.Q. Jahangirabad, Bhopal (M.P.).

¶10

---- Non-applicant s

¶11

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶12

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Mr. Aman Ansari, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. A.G.

¶13

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶14

03. 11.2023

¶15

1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an appliction seeking condonation of delay in filing the present MCC.

¶16

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay caused in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.

¶17

3. With the consent of the parties, heard finally.

¶18

4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPS No.7502 of 2007 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 04.01.2018.

¶19

5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WPS No.7502 of 2007 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) before High Court Legal Services Committee and file proof thereof before this Court within 10 days from today. It is made clear that failure to deposit amount of cost by the applicant within above time frame, will lead to automatic dissolution of this order.

¶20

6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed .

¶21

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶22

s@if

Lalit Kumar Soni (Since Dead) Through L.R. Smt. Meena Soni v. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Union Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalit Kumar Soni (Since Dead) Through L.R. Smt. Meena Soni v. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Union Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Malti Agrawal Vs Dorilal @ Ghurav Yadav

Gautam Vs Gadarai

Jethudas (dead) Proposed through legal heirs Vs Arjundas (since deceased) through legal heirs

1.A. Indradev Vs 1.A. Parsu

Gurmukh Dayalani Vs Shrinivas Garg