Akalu v. Gendlal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application for condonation of delay to restore Second Appeal No. 386/2009. The court condoned the delay and ordered the deposit of costs before the Legal Services Committee.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of 14-day delay; restoration of Second Appeal No. 386/2009 subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 costs.
What the court decided
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 18 of 2021
- Akalu S/o Gajadhar, Aged About 66 Years Cast Kenwat, R/o Village Changeri, P.S. Marwahi, Tehsil, Marwahi District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Present District Gourela Pendra Marwahi)., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
- Gendlal S/o Late Ramadhar Kenwat R/o Village Changeri, Post Parasi, P.S. And Tahsil Marwahi, District Gourela Pendra Marwahi (Chhattisgarh), District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh
- Legal Heirs Of Dead Domari S/o Ramkeshana
- State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Now Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh), District : GaurelaPendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh
- (A) Bela Bai Wd/o Shivcharan (Shivcharan S/o Domari) Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Changeri, Post Parasi, P.S. And Tahsil Marwahi, District Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (Chhattisgarh), District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 14 days in filing an application for restoration of a Second Appeal.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Akalu
- respondent
Gendlal
- respondent
Legal Heirs Of Dead Domari
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
Bela Bai
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCC/18/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court