The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn by the appellant, subject to liberty to revive if cause of action arises.
Liberty to revive the appeal in case cause of action arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Misc. Appeal (C) No. 87 of 2017
Rabul Barik S/o Abdul Barik, aged about 45 years Occupation – Kabadi, R/o Village Dipatoli, Tahsil and District, Jashpur, CG
---Appellant/NA-2
Versus
1.Smt. Shanti Devi W/o Shri Tetgu Ram aged about 55 years, Caste Uraon, R/o village Nawatoli, Jashpur, Tahsil and District Jashpur, CG
---Respondents/Claimant
NA No.1
NA No.3
Order on Board by Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
10/10/2023
Counsel for the appellant submits that as per his information the parties have settled the dispute before the trial Court, and therefore, this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. He however seeks liberty to revive the appeal in case cause of action arises.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Jyotishi
Rabul Barik
Shanti Devi
Shanker Ram
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
