The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed an interim application for withdrawal of the appeal and dismissed the first appeal as withdrawn due to a clerical error in the application caption.
Application for withdrawal allowed; first appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA(MAT) No. 140 of 2022
Smt. Anju Agrawal W/o Bhupesh Kumar Agrawal Aged About 33 Years R/o Padampur Road Basna, Police Station And Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
Bhupesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Deendayal Agrawal Aged About 39 Years R/o Padampur, Police Station And Tahsil Padampur, District Bargarh (Odisha) ---Respondent
| 07/08/2023 | Shri Shashank Thakur, counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that wrongly in the caption of the application for withdrawal, withdrawal of the writ appeal has been written whereas the word should have been first appeal. Learned counsel is directed to correct the same during the course of the day. Heard on I.A. No.01/2023 application for withdrawal of first appeal. On due consideration, I.A. No.01/2023 application for withdrawal of first appeal is allowed. Accordingly, first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- Sd/- | |
| gouri | (Goutam Bhaduri) (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Judge |
Smt. Anju Agrawal W/o Bhupesh Kumar Agrawal
Bhupesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Deendayal Agrawal
Goutam Bhaduri
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
