The applicant challenged an interim maintenance order under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, claiming accident-induced insolvency. The Court found the applicant employed and earning Rs. 28,000/month, dismissing the revision.
The criminal revision filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act was dismissed at the motion stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 1078 of 2022
Versus
2. Ku. Akanksha Yadav 18 Months, Through Natural Guardian Her Mother Smt. Neelam Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, W/o Mayashankar Yadav, R/o Dhodhipara, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicants
For Applicant : Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
03.03.2023
Heard.
-2-
non applicant No.1/wife is staying separately without any sufficient cause, therefore, order impugned is liable to be set-aside.
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Nadim
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the maintenance order against the applicant, who claims insolvency due to an accident, should be set aside.
Whether the applicant's alleged lack of income is a valid ground to infringe on the right of maintenance of the wife and minor daughter.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mayashankar Yadav
Neelam Yadav
Akanksha Yadav
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
