further accepted the fact that burn injuries can be caused to a person who tried to extinguish the fire by his hands on the person who is burning. As per Ex.D-3, proved by Dr. B.K. Sahu (PW-9), it is established that the appellant had made attempt to save the life of his wife Ritu Nawrange and furthermore, as per the dying declaration Ex.P-13, the appellant used to treat his wife with cruelty. As such, there was no premeditation on the part of the appellant to cause death of the deceased, but only because of sudden quarrel, in anger and under heat of passion, the appellant poured kerosene oil on the body of the deceased and set her ablaze, due to which she suffered burn injuries and died. Thus, in view of dicta of the Supreme Court in the matter of Kalu Ram (supra) and looking to the injuries sustained by the deceased, though the appellant had no intention, but he must have had knowledge that such injuries inflicted by him on the body of the deceased would likely to cause her death, therefore, the act of the appellant herein would fall within the purview of Exception 4 to Section 300 of IPC, as it completely satisfies the four necessary ingredients of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC i.e. (i) there must be a sudden fight; (ii) there was no premeditation; (iii) the act was committed in a heat of passion and (iv) the appellant had not taken any undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner and,
