Appeal against conviction and sentence for voluntarily causing hurt. Court upheld conviction commensurate with injuries but allowed appeal on sentence, reducing term to days already undergone and imposing a fine.
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; fine of Rs. 2,000 imposed; bail bonds extended for six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 437 of 200 4
---- Appellant
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Ms. Pooja Loniya, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Vinod Lal Chandani, Adv. For Respondent/State : Mr. Aman Kesharwani, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order on Board
10/08/2023
2
to the police station Telibandha, Raipur and consequently, FIR vide Ex.-P-8 was registered. Spot map was prepared vide Ex.-P-9 and the injured Sheikh Akram was sent for medical examination vide Ex.-P-4. The blood-stained Gupti was seized from the accused vide Ex.-P-3 and the same was sent for chemical examination vide Ex.-P-6. After completion of the investigation charge sheet was filed against the appellant.
3
4
Sd/(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE
H.L. Sahu
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the conviction and sentence under Section 324 IPC should be allowed given the appellant has already undergone the sentence period.
Whether a fine should be imposed after commuting the imprisonment to the period already undergone.
Whether the bail bonds of the appellant should be extended.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nizam S/o Jalaluddin
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
H.L. Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
