The High Court of Chhattisgarh abated the Criminal Revision appeal as the sole appellant had died and no application for substitution of LRs had been filed.
The appeal was abated due to the death of the appellant without substitution of legal representatives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 1751 of 1998
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of M.P. through CBI Jabalpur.
---- Respondent
For the Appellant/s :- Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Adv. For the State :- Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput,
Order on Board
16.03.2023
Mr. Mishra informs that the sole appellant in this appeal Marimuthu has passed away on 04.09.2011. He has also produced the death certifcate.
Since no application for substituting the Lrs of the appellant has been fled as yet, therefore, the appeal is abated.
Sd/(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
PAWAN
Marimuthu S/o. Muthan
State Of M.P.
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
