deceased Meena Painkra in which it has clearly been mentioned in the details with regard to the deceased that in the night of 09/03/2013, she poured kerosene oil and set herself ablaze. Her postmortem was conducted by Dr. R.K. Upadhyay (P.W.-10) and as per the postmortem report (Ex. P/22), cause of death is said to be deep extensive burn with septicemia with hypovolemic shock followed by cardiorespiratory collapse, however, no opinion has been given by him so far as nature of death is concerned. On the same day, inquest panchnama has been prepared vide Ex. P/9 in the presence of Dileshwar Painkra (P.W.-2), father of deceased Meena Painkra, but he did not name the appellant herein to be the author of the crime. After conducting postmortem, the dead bodies of Meena Painkra and Saahas Tiwari were handed over to Omprakash Tiwari, father of appellant Sourabh Tiwari, vide Ex. P/10 for performing last rites. Then too, Dileshwar Painkra (P.W.-2), father of deceased Meena Painkra, though present yet, did not raise any objection and neither made any suspicion upon the appellant to be author of the crime, however, thereafter, on 24/03/2013 i.e. after about 14-15 days from the date of death/offence, he filed a written report against the appellant vide Ex. P/6 at Police Station Manendragarh stating that his daughter Meena Painkra and his grandson Saahas Tiwari have been murdered by his son-in-law Sourabh Tiwari (appellant herein) on the pretext of dowry stating that
