and some silver & gold ornaments amounting to Rs.2,00,000/approximately from their house. The Sessions Court in Sessions Trial No.93/2010 while deciding the said case had, vide its order dated 8.11.2010, held that as per the order of the Succession Court, the seized property would be handed over to the person entitled on production of Succession Certificate. Meanwhile, during pendency of the succession case before the Succession Court, original applicant Mahadev Das died and therefore his legal heirs i.e. the applicants Bahura and others were substituted in the said succession case in which Darasram was also impleaded as non-applicant No.8 on the objections raised by him stating inter-alia that by virtue of an unregistered Will executed by the deceased persons in his favour on 15.4.2004, he is entitled for Succession Certificate in respect of their movable and immovable properties. However, the Succession Court could not find favour with the objections raised by Darasram and accordingly vide its order dated 14.12.2017 rejected the objection/claim raised by Darasram as well as the application filed by the applicants Bahura & others, leading to filing of two separate appeals before Appellate Court, i.e., one by Darasram and another by Bahura & others. However, the Appellate Court vide its common judgment dated 5.4.2018 while dismissing the appeal of Bahura & others, allowed the appeal filed by Darasram holding that on the basis of the unregistered Will Deed dated
