In Contempt Case No. 83 of 2022, counsel reported compliance with the earlier court order, leading to the disposal of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONTEMPT CASE (C) NO. 83 OF 2022
1. Ku. Jaishree, D/o Late Budhar Lal, aged about 29 years, R/o Sharda Para, J.P. Chowk, Camp-2, Ward No.22, behind Shrawan Kirana Stores, Bhilai Power House, District Durg (C.G.)
… Petitioner(s)
versus
1. Prashant Agrawal, Senior Superintendent of Police, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
… Respondent(s)
For Petitioner : Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Adv., under instructions of Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey, Adv., Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board [1 9/07/2023]
1. Learned Counsels for parties submit that the Order of this Court has since been complied with.
2. The Contempt Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
sharad
Ku. Jaishree
Prashant Agrawal
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
