In this contempt petition, the High Court of Chhattisgarh closed the proceeding because the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order in the underlying writ petition had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 62 of 2023
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
______________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order On Board
06/10/2023
Sd/----/-/-/-/--------/--/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu)
Judge
Praveen
Umesh Kumar Sahu
Nirmal Kumar Nag
Smt. Chudamani Kujur
Smt. Alarmelmangai D.
Kartikey Goyal
Gopal Verma
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
