Judgment on a contempt petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to challenge a subsequent decision of respondents. The petition was disposed of with that liberty.
Contempt petition disposed with liberty to challenge subsequent decision of respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 146 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Dr. Priyanka Shukla Posted As Mission Director, National Health Mission, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Trilokinath Mahilengeshwar, Posted As Chief Medical And Health Officer Mungeli, District Health Committee, National Health Mission, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board
08.02.2023
1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the order has since been complied with. However, he prays that the petitioner may be permitted to challenge the subsequent decision of the respondents.
2. The contempt petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Khatai
Chandrahaas Sen
Dr. Priyanka Shukla
Trilokinath Mahilengeshwar
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
