In contempt proceedings, the High Court accepted the respondent's submission that the petitioner's representation was already considered and decided. The court found no ground to continue the proceedings and closed the matter, discharging notices.
Contempt proceedings closed; notices issued to respondents discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 135 of 2023
M/s Sagar Industries Through Its Partner Deepak Singhania S/o Late Puran Lal Singhania Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sagar Industries Sharda Chowk, Janjgir, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate For Respondent No.1, 2 & 4 : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Kshitij Sharma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board
03/07/2023
2
that representation submitted by petitioner has already been decided, I do not find any good ground to continue with this contempt proceedings and it is accordingly closed. Notices issued to respondents stand discharged.
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be continued given the representation was already decided.
M/s Sagar Industries Through Its Partner Deepak Singhania
Neelam Namdev Ekka
Dr. S. Bharthidasan
Prabhat Malik
D. S. Chouhan
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
