The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the acquittal appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear or file representation for the last two occasions, indicating a loss of interest to pursue the appeal.
The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's total absence and lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Acquittal Appeal No.172 of 2012
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
| 12.09.2023 | None for the appellant. |
|---|---|
| None for the respondents. Since last two occasions i.e. on 31.03.2023 and on 01.08.2023 there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that by efflux of time the appellant has lost his interest to pursue the Appeal. |
|
| Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. | |
| Sd/- (N.K. Chandravanshi) Judge |
Inder
Balraj Makhija
Shiv Ram Allu Bhandar
Ramesh Wadhwani
N.K. Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
