Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of response from the petitioner despite multiple adjournments and an interim order.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 7092 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
02/05/2022 Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Deputy G.A . for the State.
| For the past various dates appearance on behalf of the petitio and the matter is getting adjourne order earlier granted on 14.12.201 next date of hearing. However, ins the interim order does not see thereafter. Today, also when the there is nobody to prosecute the wr In the given facts, it appe |
of he ner to d, tho 7, whi pite of m to matter it petiti ars th |
aring, there has been no prosecute the writ petition ugh there was an interim ch was operational till the many hearings thereafter have been discontinued is taken up for hearing, on. at the petitioner has lost |
|---|---|---|
| interest in the litigation. This dismissed the writ petition for want Accordingly, the present writ prosecution. |
Court of pros petitio |
therefore compelled to ecution. n is dismissed for want of Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Ved
Smt. Vimla Bhaskar S/o Shri G.L. Bhaskar
State Of Chhattisgarh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
