In WPS No. 5373 of 2012, the High Court of Chhattisgarh observed that the petitioners' prayers were satisfied by the respondents' undertaking to scrutinize their cases per the 07.03.2012 instructions. The court held that nothing survived and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 5373 of 2012
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
| __________________________ For Petitioners |
___________________________________ : Mr. Hariom Rai Advocate on behalf of |
|---|---|
| Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate. | |
| For Respondent/State | : Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy.G.A. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order On Board
01/07/2022
that he do not want to press any other relief and confines his prayer to the extent that the Respondents may be directed to scrutinize the case of the Petitioners individually in accordance with the instructions issued vide memo dated 07.03.2012. According to the counsel, in similar nature of case WPS No.5450/2012 vide order dated 14.12.2012, the said WPS has been disposed of with above directions to the State.
Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Shubham
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to scrutinize the petitioners' cases individually in accordance with the instructions of the memorandum dated 07.03.2012.
Vikas Kumar Kashyap
Akbar Khan
Prem Shankar
Ram Bahadur
State Of Chhattisgarh
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
