Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon submission by petitioner's counsel, without elaborating substantive findings on the underlying pension grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1042 of 2018
Smt. Snehlata Baghel, W/o Shri Shiv Kumar Baghel, Aged About 40 Years, Occupation Sahayak Shikshak (Panchayat), Posted At Govt. Primary School Tusda, Block And Tahsil Bagbahara, DistrictMahasamund (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate. For respondent No. 3 & 4 : Mr. Umakant Singh Chandel, Advocate For State : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board
23/08/2022
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
Smt. Snehlata Baghel
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector Mahasamund
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Mahasamund
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bagbahara
Block Education Officer, Bagbahara
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
