The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, without substantive adjudication on the merits.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 390 of 2020
Mr. Vaibhav Saluja S/o Mr. Balwant Rai Saluja, Aged About 33 Years R/o. L I G 672, Sector-2, Ddu Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant : Mr. Akash Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Deputy Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, Judge
Order on Board
Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
04.05.2022
Mr. Akash Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
this petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
for respondent No.1, endorses the said submission.
Sd/Sd/(Arup Kumar Goswami) (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Chief Justice Judge
Anu
Mr. Vaibhav Saluja
State of Chhattisgarh
Mrs. Shirin Mirza
Arup Kumar Goswami
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
