Allowed

Dr. Aman Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Dec 2022WPC/3689/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed by doctors with liberty to file a fresh one, without challenging a specific rule of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996, following unopposed prayer from the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition without challenging Rule 3(3)(1)(b) of the Pre-conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selecti

Dr. Aman Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 3689 of 2022

¶5

Dr. Aman Agrawal S/o Shri Ajit Agrawal Aged About 26 Years R/o P- 12, Street No. R-4, Kranti Nagar, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

Dr. Suraj Patre S/o Shri Makhan Lal Patre Aged About 26 Years R/o A - 1019, Yamuna Vihar, Ntpc Jamnipali, Korba , District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶7

Dr. Prema Choudhary S/o Shri K.R. Choudhary Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 17/2, Main Road Sambalpur, Block Bhanuprapatpur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

¶8

Dr. Nitin Tahiliyani S/o Shri Indra Tahiliyani Aged About 31 Years R/o Parijat Colony, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

Dr. Nishant Ramteke S/o Shri S.R. Ramteke Aged About 30 Years R/ o Ambedkar Chowk, Ambagarh Chhowki, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶10

Dr. Pooja Komre D/o Shri S.S. Komre Aged About 27 Years R/o Ekta Nagar, Govindpur, Kanker , District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

¶11

Dr. Kishor Kumar Paikra S/o Shri Laxman Prasad Paikra Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Kokarikona, Post Amakhoha, Thana Kasdol, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh., District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

Dr. Pallavi Patel D/o Dr. B.R. Patel Aged About 26 Years R/o Shri Janakram Hospital Kosamnara Bypass Road, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶13

Dr. Rahul Kumar Thakur S/o Shri Y.S. Thakur Aged About 27 Years R/ o Block No. 14/i/2b , Hospital Sector, Dalli Rajhara, District Balod Chhattisgarh.

¶14

Dr. Nitin Gupta S/o Shri Mahesh Gupta Aged About 33 Years R/o H.No. 76, Ward No. 12, Matiya Road, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya , New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶19

The Director Medical Education , Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nurses Hostel , Dks Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶20

Union of India Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶21

National Medical Commission Through Its Chairman , Pocket 14, Phase I, Sector 8, Dwarka New Delhi.

¶22

Dr. Kapildev Kashyap Presently Posted At Community Health Centre, Chhindgarh, District Sukma Chhattisgarh.

¶23

Dr. Vinika Bhagat Presently Posted At District Hospital Balrampur , District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

¶24

Dr. Yogeshwar Paikra Presently Posted At Community Health Center, Udaipur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

¶25

Dr. Budheshwar Singh Verma Presently Posted At District Hospital Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

¶26

Dr. Anuradha Biswas Present Posted At Primary Health Center Kotni, District Pendra Gaurela Marwahi Chhattisgarh.

¶27

Dr. Narayan Sahu Presently Posted Community Health Center, Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

¶28

Dr. Suryakant Rangari Presently Posted At District Hospital Narayanpur , District Narayanpur Chhattisgarh.

¶29

Dr. Sonam Netam Presently Posted At District Hospital Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh.

¶30

---- Respondents

¶31

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶32

¶33

For Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Venkatesh Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents No. 5 to 10 & 12 : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate.

¶34

Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice

¶35

Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal , Judge

¶36

Order on Board

¶37

Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice

¶38

02.12.2022

¶39

On 22.11.2022, this Court had passed the following order:

¶40

“A week’s time is granted to Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain instructions in the light of order dated 13.11.2017 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(C) No. 16657/16659 of 2016 ((XIV).

¶41

List on 01.12.2022.

¶42

Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, learned Central Government Counsel, appearing for respondent No.3, Ms. Juhi Pandey, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.4 and Mr. Aakash Pandey, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.6, are present.”

¶43

¶44

Today, Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition without challenging the Rule 3(3)(1)(b) of the Pre-conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules, 1996.

¶45

Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, Additional Advocate General, appearing for respondents No. 1 & 2, Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel, appearing for Respondent No. 3, Mr. Venkatesh Pandey, appearing for Respondent No. 4 and Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate, appearing for Respondents No. 5 to 10 & 12, have no objection

¶46

Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶47

Sd/Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami) (Sanjay Agrawal ) Chief Justice Judge

¶48

Hem

Dr. Aman Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Aman Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Shamsher Singh Vs General Manager

Narbadia Bai Vs Manharan Srivas

Harishankar Joshi Vs Shri M.n. Rajulkar

Dr. Ruchir Tyagi Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

U.N. Iyengar Vs Union of India

Abhishek Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh