Single judge order dismissing writ petition against Additional Commissioner for lack of compromise decree; held suit was only withdrawn, not compromised under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.
Petition dismissed finding no compromise decree existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP (227) No. 70 of 2022
Smt. Kusumlata Patel W/o Bhuwanlal Patel R/o Bade Rampur, Ward No.8, Raigarh City, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.).
---- Applicant
Versus
--Respondents
For Applicant : Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Adv. For Respondent : None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board
27/01/2022
2
dismissed.
Sd/(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
rahul
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revenue authority was correct in observing that there was no compromise decree when the suit was only withdrawn before the Lok Adalat
Whether the impugned order dismissing the review application was arbitrary and malafide
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kusumlata Patel W/o Bhuwanlal Patel
Mohanlal @ Ramkumar S/o Late Parasram Patel
Shyamkumar Patel, S/o Late Parasram patel
K.L. Real Estate through its Director Bajrang Jindal S/o Kundanlal Jindal
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
