The petitioner in this writ petition seeking appointment of a Kotwar failed to appear before the High Court of Chhattisgarh. The court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution due to non-appearance on two consecutive dates.
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(227) No. 59 of 2015
---- Petitioner
Versus
Respondent No. 5 & 6 R/o Village – Bharda, P.H. No. 20, Tahsil – Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.)
---- Respondents For Petitioner : None. For State/Respondents 1 & 4 : Mr. Lalit Jangde, Deputy Government Advocate For Respondent No. 5 : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
08.09.2022
“None for the petitioner.
Mr. Lalit Jangde, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents 1 to 4.
Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate for respondents 5 &
The matter was called for hearing on 06.07.2022, but
2
no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering the fact that since the matter pertains to appointment of Kotwar and same is listed in weekly list, therefore, call it tomorrow again.”
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with the petition when the petitioner failed to appear for hearing without representation.
Chandrahas S/o Thakurram Satnami
State of Chhattisgarh Through the President Board of Revenue, Raipur
Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division
Sub Divisional Officer, Kurud
Tahsildar, Kurud
Smt. Laxmi Bai D/o Jogvaram Satnami
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
