Petitioner withdrew writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings; impugned order copy to be returned. No substantive decision made on merits.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to file appropriate proceedings; copy of impugned order to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 141 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner : Shri Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Atanu Ghosh, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board
04.03.2022
to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same in the record.
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE
padma
Smt. Mahima Sharma
Gaurav Tyagi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
