In the absence of any party appearing in two rounds of hearing, the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the transfer petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Transfer Petition (C) No. 12 of 2022
Smt. Jamuna W/o sandeep Kumar ghritlahre, Ageda
bout 25 years, R/o village Pandripali Post Office,
Pendrawan Tahsil Bargarh, Distt Baloda-Bazar,
Chhattisgarh.
Versus
Sandeep Kumar Ghritlahre, S/o Bhagwat Prasad
Ghritlahre, Aged about 27 years, R/o Village Khapri
Police Station Bhatapara Gramin Distt. Balodabazar,
Chhattisgarh.
---Respondent
For Petitioner:-None
For Respondent :-None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
11/10/2022
1. The matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared on behalf of the parties in two rounds. In that case, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the instant petition for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, this transfer petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Judge
Harneet
Smt. Jamuna W/o Sandeep Kumar Ghritlahre
Sandeep Kumar Ghritlahre
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Harneet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court