Dismissed
Sukhmat Bai v. Tijan Bai
Chhattisgarh HCSA/717/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an appeal brought by five appellants when their counsel requested and was granted leave to withdraw the appeal during the hearing.
What did the court decide?
None. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
NAFR
¶3
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶4
SA No. 717 of 2017
¶5
- Sukhmat Bai D/o Late Makhan, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
¶6
- Hemu, S/o Late Makhan, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
¶7
- Girja Bai, D/o Late Makhan, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
¶8
- Vimla Bai, D/o Late Makhan, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
¶9
- Mana Bai Alias Manmati, D/o Late Makhan, Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellants
¶10
- Versus
¶11
- Tijan Bai D/o Sadhram, R/o Village Mudhipar, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sukhmat Bai D/o Late Makhan
- appellant
Hemu S/o Late Makhan
- appellant
Girja Bai D/o Late Makhan
- appellant
Vimla Bai D/o Late Makhan
- appellant
Mana Bai Alias Manmati D/o Late Makhan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/717/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court