This high court order dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution after the service report indicated the appellants could not be found at the provided address. No substantive issues were decided.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 167 of 2014
1.A. Smt. Hamidun, W/o Late Mirja Azizul Rehman Baig, aged about 49 years, R/o Hafijan Manjil Tarbahar, Bilaspur, Tah. And Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
1.B. Smt. Ruhi Begam D/o Late Mirja Azizul Rehman Baig, aged about 22 Years R/o Sakti, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
B. Shakil Baig
Both Pisran S/o Late Vakil Ahamed Both R/o Korba, Tahsil and District: Korba C.G.
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondents
________________________________________________________________
For Appellants : None.
For Respondent No.4/State : Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order On Board
06.07.2022
Service report of SPC issued to the appellants received mentioning that the appellants were not found in the given address.
Looking to the above, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Saurabh
Mirja Azizul Rehman Baig S/o Mirja Rasid Baig Since Dead (Lrs) and Others
Roshan Bi Wd/o Ishhaq
Rahmat Ali @ Babu Bhai S/o Ishhaq
Moh. Yasin S/o Ishhaq
State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
