Dismissed
Ramnarayan v. Rikhiram and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCSA/13/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No factual issues. The appellant counsel indicated that the appeal is not pressed.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
NAFR
¶2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶3
SA No. 13 of 2014
¶4
Ramnarayan S/o Guhari Sahu, aged about 42 years R/o Village: Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tahsil: Gunderdehi, District: Durg (Now Balod), Chhattisgarh
¶5
---- Petitioner
¶6
Versus
¶7
- Rikhiram S/o Charan Singh Sahu, aged about 45 years R/o Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg Now Distt. Balod C.G., Chhattisgarh
¶8
- Rupsingh S/o Jai Lal Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg Now District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
¶9
- Rohit S/o Guharam Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg Now District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
¶10
- Devendra Kumar S/o Shiv Prasad Sahu Aged About 37 Years R/o Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg Now District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
¶11
- Daleshwar S/o Keshav Sahu Aged About 48 Years R/o Bodal, P.O. Rajoli, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg Now District : Balod, Chhattisgarh
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ramnarayan S/o Guhari Sahu
- respondent
Rikhiram S/o Charan Singh Sahu
- respondent
Rupsingh S/o Jai Lal Sahu
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/13/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court