In this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the plea for regular bail, finding the case a fit one to refuse relief given the severity of allegations and unexamined prosecution witnesses.
The applicant was denied regular bail and the bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 7431 of 2022
Durgesh Sahu S/o Revaram Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o Khamtarai, In front of Kali Mandir, P.S. Sarkanda, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, P.S - Sarkanda, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
| --- Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Applicant | : Mr. Rishabh Bajaj, Advocate. |
| For Respondent/State | : Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh & Mr. Himashu Sharma, PL. |
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J Order on Board
07/09/2022
2
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
J/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail in a second bail application where impugned order was withdrawn earlier.
Whether evidence from unexamined prosecution witnesses precludes grant of bail at this stage.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Durgesh Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
