committed any offence and have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that there is no previous criminal antecedents registered against the present applicants, they are in jail since 09.10.2021, trial may take some time, therefore, they may be released on bail. He further submits that the seizure of 51.300 kgs contraband (Ganja) was made effective from the owner of the vehicle, there is no contraband was seized from the exclusive possession of the applicants. He further goes to show that the case of prosecution basically rested upon the statements of two star witnesses who are the independent witnesses of entire investigation carried out by the prosecution starting notice to be a witness under Section 160 CrPC (Ex.P-1), consent to witness (Ex.P-2), notice given to accused under Section 100 regarding search (Ex.P-3,4), Search Panchnama of self-witness force (Ex.P-5) Notice under Section 50 (Ex.P-6,7,8), recovery Panchnama (Ex.P-9), Narcotic Drug identification panchnama (Ex.P-10), weight scale verification panchnama (Ex.P-11), drug weight panchnama (Ex.P-12), samras panchnama (Ex.P-13), Sample Seal Panchnama (Ex.P-14), seizure memo (Ex.P-15), Arrest Memo (Ex.P-16,17,18), they have not supported the case of prosecution and turned hostile. He submits that in view of the facts and circumstances of the case there are reasonable grounds to believe that the applicants are not guilty and they would not commit same crime in future while on bail. He submits that the condition of Section 37 of NDPS Act has been satisfied and therefore there is no bar to this Court in granting bail to the applicants. He further relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh1 .
