In a bail application under the NDPS Act, the High Court noted that seizure witnesses failed to support the prosecution. The court granted bail without further merit observation.
Release of the applicant on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4626 of 2022
Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Vishwanath Aged About 22 Years R/o VillageJamudi, P.O.- Khujrael, P.S.- Adalhaat, Tehsil- Chunnar, DistrictMirzapur
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Sanawal, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For applicant - Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent/State – Shri Ajay Kumrani, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order
14/06/2022
2
witnesses have not supported the case of the prosecution.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail in a narcotics offence when seizure witnesses disowned the incident.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
