The High Court dismissed a second bail application under Section 439 CrPC. The court held that the seriousness of allegations justified denial of bail despite witness unreliability, allowing revival only after six months of trail delay.
The application was rejected; applicant allowed to revive bail after 6 months delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No.4134 of 2022
Mohd. Rasheed Ali S/o Aabid Ali, Aged About 38 Years Caste - Muslim, R/o Narsinghgarh, Post- Mudhar, Aadhar Ganj, P.S - Raniganj, District - Pratapgarh, U.P. Permanent R/o - B-86, Badri Awas, Mehdauri, Teliyarganj, Prayagraj, P.S. - Shivpuri, Tahsil - Sadar, District- Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. -----Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- S.H.O, P.S - Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ----Non-Applicant
For Applicant: Shri Pushkar Sinha, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State: Smt M. Asha, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board
15.07.2022
am not inclined to allow this application.
Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Priya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant given the seriousness of allegations and lack of substantial change in circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Rasheed Ali
State Of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
