In this 3rd bail application, the High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the plea regarding possession of codeine, alprazolam, and tramadol. Relying on Section 37 of the NDPS Act and precedent, the court held it was not a fit case for bail under Section 439 CrPC.
Application under Section 439 of CrPC rejected; applicants not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3624 of 2022
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicants : Shri Vikash Pradhan, Advocate For State : Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy.G.A.
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
18/07/2022
2
phosphate cum alprazolam tablets, Spas-Trancan plus tablets having content of tramadol hydrochloride which are all prohibited under NDPS Act. They were also found in possession of an automatic knife and one air gun.
Deepti
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in a case involving accused found in possession of prohibited drugs under the NDPS Act.
Whether the applicants are fit for release on bail despite previous rejection due to rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Buddhadev Pande
Ranjan Kare
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
